Artigos Científicos

Surface Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants with Different Topographies

Surface Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants with Different Topographies

M.H. Prado da Silva^a, G.A. Soares^a*, C.N. Elias^b, J.H.C. Lima^c, H. Schechtman^d, I.R. Gibson^e, S.M. Best^e

^aCOPPE/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, C.P. 68505, 21945-970 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
^bEEIMVR/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Volta Redonda - RJ, Brazil
^cInstituto Brasileiro de Implantodontia - RJ, Brazil
^dFIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
^eIRC in Biomedical Materials, QMWC, University of London, U. K.

e-mail: gloria@metalmat.ufrj.br

Received: December 17, 1999; July 31, 2000

Link: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392000000300003

Abstract: Cylindrical dental implants made of commercially pure titanium were analysed in four different surface finishes: as-machined, Al₂O₃ blasted with Al₂O₃particles, plasma-sprayed with titanium beads and electrolytically coated with hydroxyapatite. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDX) revealed the topography of the surfaces and provided qualitative results of the chemical composition of the different implants. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was used to perform chemical analysis on the surface of the implants while Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSM) produced topographic maps of the analysed surfaces. Optical Profilometry was used to quantitatively characterise the level of roughness of the surfaces. The implant that was plasma-sprayed and the hydroxyapatite coated implant showed the roughest surface, followed by the implant blasted with alumina and the as-machined implant. Some remnant contamination from the processes of blasting, coating and cleaning was detected by XPS.

Keywords: titanium, dental implants, surface characterisation

VOLTAR